Blog · Fairness & Anti-Cheating

Online Poker Evidence Checklist: What to Save Before You Report

Player Guides Published October 22, 2026 · Fair Poker Research Team

A suspicious online poker hand can feel obvious in the moment and confusing five minutes later. Maybe two accounts kept folding in strange spots. Maybe a player acted instantly on every street. Maybe the same seat seemed to know too much. A useful report needs more than a feeling, but it also does not need you to become a detective.

This checklist explains what to save before you report a concern. It is for players who want a calm, privacy-aware way to preserve context. It does not teach cheating methods; it helps a platform or community moderator review what happened.

Start with the hand record

The first item is the hand history or fairness receipt for the exact hand. Save the hand ID, table name, time, blind level, seat order, public board cards, actions, pot sizes, showdown result, and any verification link the site provides. If the platform has a built-in export, use that before taking screenshots.

A hand history is stronger than a memory because it keeps the order of actions clear. If you are not sure what the record contains, read what a hand history is. If the issue is about the deal itself, save the shuffle or verification evidence too, then compare it later with verifying a shuffle step by step.

Do not edit the record to make it look cleaner. If you need to explain something, write notes beside the original export. Reviewers need to know which parts came from the platform and which parts are your own observations.

Add context without guessing

One hand rarely proves a pattern. If the concern involves collusion, chip dumping, ghosting, or automated play, the surrounding context matters. Save nearby hands from the same session, especially hands involving the same accounts, unusual folds, repeated timing patterns, or one-sided transfers of chips.

Keep your notes factual. Instead of writing “they are definitely cheating,” write “Seat 3 folded to Seat 6 in three large pots without showdown” or “Seat 2 acted in under one second on 18 consecutive decisions.” Clear observations are easier to review than accusations.

For behavior-based concerns, it helps to understand the difference between suspicious play and normal variance. The guide on collusion or variance in online poker is a useful reference before sending a report.

Good evidence is boring on purpose: exact hand IDs, exact times, exact actions, and a short note about why the pattern looked unusual.

Protect private information

Evidence should not expose more personal data than necessary. Before sharing anything outside the platform’s official report channel, remove email addresses, device names, account recovery details, payment information, private chat, and unrelated browser tabs. If a screenshot shows your full screen, crop it to the poker table or export the hand instead.

Be careful with public posts. A public accusation can harm innocent players and can also leak your own account details. When possible, send the report through the platform’s official support or security channel first. If you need to share a hand with friends for discussion, use the safer steps in how to share a hand history safely.

The goal is not secrecy for its own sake. The goal is to give reviewers enough information to investigate while keeping unrelated personal data out of circulation.

What a strong report includes

A strong report is short and complete. Include the hand IDs, session time, player nicknames or seat numbers, the behavior you noticed, and why it matters. Attach the original hand history, screenshots only when useful, and any verification link or fairness receipt.

If several hands form the pattern, list them in order. A simple timeline is often better than a long paragraph. For example: hand one, unusual fold; hand two, same two seats avoid showdown; hand three, large transfer after weak action. Do not add theories about identity, location, or tools unless you have direct evidence from the platform.

After reporting, avoid trying to test the suspected player by changing your own behavior in extreme ways. That can damage the evidence and make the review harder. Keep playing normally, or leave the table if you feel uncomfortable.

Final thought

The best poker evidence checklist is simple: save the original record, add nearby context, keep notes factual, and protect private information. A careful report will not prove every concern, but it gives the people reviewing the game a much better starting point than anger, screenshots without hand IDs, or public accusations.

Curious how provable fairness is built?

Fair Poker is a non-profit open-source research project on verifiable Texas Hold’em fairness: the deck is co-encrypted and shuffled by participant browsers, there is no dealing server, and every hand can be verified independently. The project provides no gaming service to the public; the full source is published — download it and run your own instance to study it.

Download the source

This site is a non-profit open-source research project and provides no gaming service to the public; the demo is research-testing only with valueless test chips — no real-money gambling. This article is educational content, not betting advice.

← Back to all articles